Paper detail

Universal scaling dependence of QCD energy loss from data driven studies

In this paper we study the energy loss of jets in the QGP via the nuclear modification factor $R_{\textrm{AA}}$ for unidentified particles at high $p_{\textrm{T}}$ ($\gtrsim 10 \textrm{GeV}/c$) in and out of the reaction plane of the collision. We argue that at such a high $p_{\textrm{T}}$ there are no genuine flow effects and, assuming that the energy loss is only sensitive to initial characteristics such as the density and geometry, find that $R_{\textrm{AA}}$ depends linearly on the (RMS) length extracted from Glauber simulations. Furthermore we observe that for different centrality classes the density dependence of the energy loss enters as the square root of the charged particle multiplicity normalized to the initial overlap area. The energy loss extracted for RHIC and LHC data from the $R_{\textrm{AA}}$ is found to exhibit a universal behavior.

preprint2014arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.