Abstract
In \cite{F} there is a statement generalizing the results in \cite{FG}. Unfortunately there is a mistake in a computation that affects the main result. I don't know if the main result in \cite{F} is true or not, but I propose an alternative statement (Theorem 3.7) that was actually the main motivation in \cite{FG}. This statement answers in an affirmative way the question whether the localization of the FRT construction with respect to a quantum determinant is a Hopf algebra, in case the Nichols algebra associated to the braiding is finite dimensional.
Connections
Explore this paper’s authors, topics and related work.
Building this map preview
BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.
Reviews 0
Write a review
No reviews yet.
Discussion 0
Add a comment
No comments yet.