Paper detail

Universal Quantization for Separate Encodings and Joint Decoding of Correlated Sources

We consider the multi-user lossy source-coding problem for continuous alphabet sources. In a previous work, Ziv proposed a single-user universal coding scheme which uses uniform quantization with dither, followed by a lossless source encoder (entropy coder). In this paper, we generalize Ziv's scheme to the multi-user setting. For this generalized universal scheme, upper bounds are derived on the redundancies, defined as the differences between the actual rates and the closest corresponding rates on the boundary of the rate region. It is shown that this scheme can achieve redundancies of no more than 0.754 bits per sample for each user. These bounds are obtained without knowledge of the multi-user rate region, which is an open problem in general. As a direct consequence of these results, inner and outer bounds on the rate-distortion achievable region are obtained.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.