Paper detail

Universal IMF vs dark halo response in early-type galaxies: breaking the degeneracy with the fundamental plane

We use the relations between aperture stellar velocity dispersion (σ_ap), stellar mass (M_sps), and galaxy size (R_e) for a sample of \sim 150,000 early-type galaxies from SDSS/DR7 to place constraints on the stellar initial mass function (IMF) and dark halo response to galaxy formation. We build LCDM based mass models that reproduce, by construction, the relations between galaxy size, light concentration and stellar mass, and use the spherical Jeans equations to predict σ_ap. Given our model assumptions (including those in the stellar population synthesis models), we find that reproducing the median σ_ap vs M_sps relation is not possible with {\it both} a universal IMF and a universal dark halo response. Significant departures from a universal IMF and/or dark halo response are required, but there is a degeneracy between these two solutions. We show that this degeneracy can be broken using the strength of the correlation between residuals of the velocity-mass (Δlog σ_ap) and size-mass (Δlog R_e) relations. The slope of this correlation, d_vr \equiv Δlog σ_ap/Δlog R_e, varies systematically with galaxy mass from d_vr \simeq -0.45 at M_sps \sim 10^{10}M_sun, to d_vr \simeq -0.15 at M_sps \sim 10^{11.6} M_sun. The virial fundamental plane (FP) has d_vr=-1/2, and thus we find the tilt of the observed FP is mass dependent. Reproducing this tilt requires {\it both} a non-universal IMF and a non-universal halo response. Our best model has mass-follows-light at low masses (Msps < 10^{11.2}M_sun) and unmodified NFW haloes at M_sps \sim 10^{11.5} M_sun. The stellar masses imply a mass dependent IMF which is "lighter" than Salpeter at low masses and "heavier" than Salpeter at high masses.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.