Paper detail

Universal criterion for designability of heteropolymers

Proteins are an example of heteropolymers able to self-assemble in specific target structures. The self-assembly of designed artificial heteropolymers is still, to the best of our knowledge, not possible with control over the single chain self-assembling properties comparable to what natural proteins can achieve. What artificial heteropolymers lacks compared to bio-heteropolymers that grants the latter such a versatility? Is the geometry of the protein skeleton the only a particular choice to be designable? Here we introduce a general criteria to discriminate which polymer backbones can be designed to adopt a predetermined structure. With our approach we can explore different polymer backbones and different amino acids alphabets. By comparing the radial distribution functions of designable and not-designable scenarios we identify as designability criteria the presence of a particular peak in the radial distribution function that dominates over the random packing of the heteropolymer. We show that the peak is a universal feature of all designable heteropolymers, as it is dominating also the radial distribution function of natural proteins. Our finding can help in understanding the key features that make proteins a highly designable system. The criteria that we present can be applied to engineer new types of self-assembling modular polymers that will open new applications for polymer based material science.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access7 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.