Paper detail

Universal Bayesian Measures and Universal Histogram Sequences

Consider universal data compression: the length $l(x^n)$ of sequence $x^n\in A^n$ with finite alphabet $A$ and length $n$ satisfies Kraft's inequality over $A^n$, and $-\frac{1}{n}\log \frac{P^n(x^n)}{Q^n(x^n)}$ almost surely converges to zero as $n$ grows for the $Q^n(x^n)=2^{-l(x^n)}$ and any stationary ergodic source $P$. In this paper, we say such a $Q$ is a universal Bayesian measure. We generalize the notion to the sources in which the random variables may be either discrete, continuous, or none of them. The basic idea is due to Boris Ryabko who utilized model weighting over histograms that approximate $P$, assuming that a density function of $P$ exists. However, the range of $P$ depends on the choice of the histogram sequence. The universal Bayesian measure constructed in this paper overcomes the drawbacks and has many applications to infer relation among random variables, and extends the application area of the minimum description length principle.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Authors

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.