Paper detail

Unitary and analytic model of nucleon EM structure, the puzzle with JLab proton polarization data and new insight into proton charge distribution

The Unitary and analytic model of nucleon electromagnetic structure, describing all existing nucleon form factor data, is briefly reviewed. Then in the framework of this model the problem of inconsistency of older proton electric form factor data in space-like region (obtained from $% e^{-}p\to e^{-}p$ process by the Rosenbluth technique) with recent Jefferson Lab data on the ratio $G_{Ep}(t)/G_{Mp}(t)$ (measured in precise polarization $\overrightarrow{e}^{-}p\to e^{-}\overrightarrow{p}$ experiment) is suggested to be solved in favour of the latter data which, however, unlike older data cause an existence of the form factor zero, i.e. a difraction minimum in $|G_{Ep}(t)|$ around $t=-Q^{2}=-13$GeV$^{2}$. The new behaviour of $G_{Ep}(t)$ with the zero gives modified proton charge distribution with enlarged value of the mean square charge radius.

preprint2005arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.