Paper detail

Unit Disk Cover Problem

Given a set ${\cal D}$ of unit disks in the Euclidean plane, we consider (i) the {\it discrete unit disk cover} (DUDC) problem and (ii) the {\it rectangular region cover} (RRC) problem. In the DUDC problem, for a given set ${\cal P}$ of points the objective is to select minimum cardinality subset ${\cal D}^* \subseteq {\cal D}$ such that each point in ${\cal P}$ is covered by at least one disk in ${\cal D}^*$. On the other hand, in the RRC problem the objective is to select minimum cardinality subset ${\cal D}^{**} \subseteq {\cal D}$ such that each point of a given rectangular region ${\cal R}$ is covered by a disk in ${\cal D}^{**}$. For the DUDC problem, we propose an $(9+ε)$-factor ($0 < ε\leq 6$) approximation algorithm. The previous best known approximation factor was 15 \cite{FL12}. For the RRC problem, we propose (i) an $(9 + ε)$-factor ($0 < ε\leq 6$) approximation algorithm, (ii) an 2.25-factor approximation algorithm in reduce radius setup, improving previous 4-factor approximation result in the same setup \cite{FKKLS07}. The solution of DUDC problem is based on a PTAS for the subproblem LSDUDC, where all the points in ${\cal P}$ are on one side of a line and covered by the disks centered on the other side of that line.

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.