Paper detail

Unipolar Inductor Model coupled to GW emission: energy budget and model application to RX J0806+15 and RX J1914+24

We further discuss the Unipolar Inductor Model (UIM) coupled to GW emission (Dall'Osso et al. 2005) and compare it to observed properties of the two candidate ultrashort period binaries RX J0806+15 and RX J1914+24 . We consider the measured orbital periods, period derivatives and inferred X-ray luminosities of these two sources and find constraints on system parameters in order for the model to account for them. We find that these properties point to the two sources being in different regimes of the UIM, with the requirement of low magnetic moment primaries ($\sim 10^{30} G cm^3$) for both. Given this weak magnetization, RX J0806+15 has a sufficiently low luminosity that it can be interpreted as having a primary spin almost synchronous to and just slightly slower than the orbital motion. Its measured orbital spin-up is only slightly affected by spin-orbit coupling and is mostly due to GW emission. RX J1914+24, on the other hand, is too bright in X-rays and has too slow an orbital spin-up for the same regime to apply. We suggest that this binary system may be emitting GWs at a significantly higher rate than implied by its measured $\dotω_o = 6 \times 10^{-17} rad s^{-2}$. The latter is explained, in this framework, by the primary spin being slightly faster than the orbital motion ($α<or= 1.1$). In this case, the associated spin-orbit coupling transfers to the orbit a significant amount of angular momentum, thus partially balancing that lost to GW emission. All expectations can be tested in the near future to confirm the viability of the model.

preprint2006arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.