Paper detail

Union of Random Minkowski Sums and Network Vulnerability Analysis

Let $\mathcal{C}=\{C_1,\ldots,C_n\}$ be a set of $n$ pairwise-disjoint convex sets of constant description complexity, and let $π$ be a probability density function (pdf for short) over the non-negative reals. For each $i$, let $K_i$ be the Minkowski sum of $C_i$ with a disk of radius $r_i$, where each $r_i$ is a random non-negative number drawn independently from the distribution determined by $π$. We show that the expected complexity of the union of $K_1, \ldots, K_n$ is $O(n^{1+\varepsilon})$ for any $\varepsilon > 0$; here the constant of proportionality depends on $\varepsilon$ and on the description complexity of the sets in $\mathcal{C}$, but not on $π$. If each $C_i$ is a convex polygon with at most $s$ vertices, then we show that the expected complexity of the union is $O(s^2n\log n)$. Our bounds hold in the stronger model in which we are given an arbitrary multi-set $R=\{r_1,\ldots,r_n\}$ of expansion radii, each a non-negative real number. We assign them to the members of $\mathcal{C}$ by a random permutation, where all permutations are equally likely to be chosen; the expectations are now with respect to these permutations. We also present an application of our results to a problem that arises in analyzing the vulnerability of a network to a physical attack. %

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.