Paper detail

Unimodality of the independence polynomials of some composite graphs

Let $I(G;x)$ denote the independence polynomial of a graph $G$. In this paper we study the unimodality properties of $I(G;x)$ for some composite graphs $G$. Given two graphs $G_1$ and $G_2$, let $G_1[G_2]$ denote the lexicographic product of $G_1$ and $G_2$. Assume $I(G_1;x)=\sum_{i\geq0}a_ix^i$ and $I(G_2;x)=\sum_{i\geq0}b_ix^i$, where $I(G_2;x)$ is log-concave. Then we prove (i) if $I(G_1;x)$ is log-concave and $(a^2_i-a_{i-1}a_{i+1})b^2_1\geq a_ia_{i-1}b_2$ for all $1\leq i \leq α(G_1)$, then $I(G_1[G_2];x)$ is log-concave; (ii) if $a_{i-1}\leq b_1a_i$ for $1\leq i\leq α(G_1)$, then $I(G_1[G_2];x)$ is unimodal. In particular, if $a_i$ is increasing in $i$, then $I(G_1[G_2];x)$ is unimodal. We also give two sufficient conditions when the independence polynomial of a complete multipartite graph is unimodal or log-concave. Finally, for every odd positive integer $α> 3$, we find a connected graph $G$ not a tree, such that $α(G) =α$, and $I(G; x)$ is symmetric and has only real zeros. This answers a problem of Mandrescu and Mirică.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.