Paper detail

Unifying Sunyaev-Zel'dovich and X-ray predictions from clusters to galaxy groups: the impact of X-ray mass estimates on the $Y-M$ scaling relation

One of the main limitations in precision cluster cosmology arises from systematic errors and uncertainties in estimating cluster masses. Using the Mock-X pipeline, we produce synthetic X-ray images and derive cluster and galaxy group X-ray properties for a sample of over 30,000 simulated galaxy groups and clusters with $M_{\rm 500crit}$ between $10^{12}$ and $2\times 10^{15}$ M$_{\odot}$ in IllustrisTNG. We explore the similarities and differences between IllustrisTNG predictions of the Sunyaev-Zel'dovich and X-ray scaling relations with mass. We find a median hydrostatic mass bias $b = 0.125 \pm 0.003$ for $M_{\rm 500crit}$ $>10^{13}$ M$_{\odot}$. The bias increases to $b = 0.17 \pm 0.004$ when masses are derived from synthetic X-ray observations. We model how different underlying assumptions about the dependence of $Y_{\rm X}$ on halo mass can generate biases in the observed $Y_{\rm SZ} - M_{Y_{\rm X}}$ scaling relation. In particular, the simplifying assumption that $Y_{\rm X} - M_{\rm tot}$ is self-similar at all mass scales largely hides the break in $Y_{\rm SZ} - M_{\rm tot}$ and overestimates $Y_{\rm SZ}$ at galaxy and groups scales. We show that calibrating the $Y_{\rm X}-$mass proxy using a new model for a smoothly broken power law reproduces the true underlying $Y_{\rm SZ} - M_{\rm tot}$ scaling relation with high accuracy. Moreover, $M_{Y_{\rm X}}$ estimates calibrated with this method lead to $Y_{\rm SZ} - M_{Y_{\rm X}}$ predictions that are not biased by the presence of lower mass clusters or galaxy groups in the sample. Finally, we show that our smoothly broken power law model provides a robust way to derive the $Y_{\rm X}-$mass proxy, significantly reducing the level of mass bias for clusters, groups, and galaxies.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access10 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.