Paper detail

Unifying models for X-ray selected and Radio selected BL Lac Objects

We discuss alternative interpretations of the differences in the Spectral Energy Distributions (SEDs) of BL Lacs found in complete Radio or X-ray surveys. A large body of observations in different bands suggests that the SEDs of BL Lac objects appearing in X-ray surveys differ from those appearing in radio surveys mainly in having a (synchrotron) spectral cut-off (or break) at much higher frequency. In order to explain the different properties of radio and X-ray selected BL Lacs Giommi and Padovani proposed a model based on a common radio luminosity function. At each radio luminosity, objects with high frequency spectral cut-offs are assumed to be a minority. Nevertheless they dominate the X-ray selected population due to the larger X-ray-to-radio-flux ratio. An alternative model explored here (reminiscent of the orientation models previously proposed) is that the X-ray luminosity function is "primary" and that at each X-ray luminosity a minority of objects has larger radio-to-X-ray flux ratio. The predictions of the two scenarios, computed via a Montecarlo technique, are compared with the observed properties of BL Lacs in the two samples extracted respectively from the 1 Jy radio survey and the Einstein Slew Survey. We show that both models can explain a number but not all the observed features. We then propose a completely new approach, based on the idea that the physical parameter which governs the shape of the SEDs, is (or is associated with) the bolometric luminosity. Assuming an empirical relation between spectral shape and luminosity we show that the observational properties of the two surveys can be reproduced at least with the same accuracy as the two previous models.

preprint1997arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.