Paper detail

Uniform stabilization of 3D Navier-Stokes equations in critical Besov spaces with finite dimensional, tangential-like boundary, localized feedback controllers

The present paper provides a solution in the affirmative to a recognized open problem in the theory of uniform stabilization of 3-dimensional Navier-Stokes equations in the vicinity of an unstable equilibrium solution, by means of a `minimal' and `least' invasive feedback strategy which consists of a control pair $\{ v,u \}$ \cite{LT2:2015}. Here $v$ is a tangential boundary feedback control, acting on an arbitrary small part $\widetildeΓ$ of the boundary $Γ$; while $u$ is a localized, interior feedback control, acting tangentially on an arbitrarily small subset $ω$ of the interior supported by $\widetildeΓ$. The ideal strategy of taking $u = 0$ on $ω$ is not sufficient. A question left open in the literature was: Can such feedback control $v$ of the pair $\{ v, u \}$ be asserted to be finite dimensional also in the dimension $d = 3$? We here give an affirmative answer to this question, thus establishing an optimal result. To achieve the desired finite dimensionality of the feedback tangential boundary control $v$, it is here then necessary to abandon the Hilbert setting of past literature and replace it with a Besov setting which are `close' to $L^3(Ω)$ for $d=3$. It is in line with recent critical well-posedness in the full space of the non-controlled N-S equations. A key feature of such Besov spaces with tight indices is that they do not recognize compatibility conditions. The proof is constructive and is "optimal" also regarding the "minimal" number of tangential boundary controllers needed. The new setting requires establishing maximal regularity in the required critical Besov setting for the overall closed-loop linearized problem with tangential feedback control applied on the boundary. Finally, the minimal amount of tangential boundary action is linked to the issue of unique continuation of over-determined Oseen eigenproblems.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.