Paper detail

Uniform error estimates for Navier-Stokes flow with an exact moving boundary using the immersed interface method

We prove that uniform accuracy of almost second order can be achieved with a finite difference method applied to Navier-Stokes flow at low Reynolds number with a moving boundary, or interface, creating jumps in the velocity gradient and pressure. Difference operators are corrected to $O(h)$ near the interface using the immersed interface method, adding terms related to the jumps, on a regular grid with spacing $h$ and periodic boundary conditions. The force at the interface is assumed known within an error tolerance; errors in the interface location are not taken into account. The error in velocity is shown to be uniformly $O(h^2|\log{h}|^2)$, even at grid points near the interface, and, up to a constant, the pressure has error $O(h^2|\log{h}|^3)$. The proof uses estimates for finite difference versions of Poisson and diffusion equations which exhibit a gain in regularity in maximum norm.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.