Paper detail

Uniform error bounds of an exponential wave integrator for the long-time dynamics of the nonlinear Klein-Gordon equation

We establish uniform error bounds of an exponential wave integrator Fourier pseudospectral (EWI-FP) method for the long-time dynamics of the nonlinear Klein-Gordon equation (NKGE) with a cubic nonlinearity whose strength is characterized by $\varepsilon^2$ with $\varepsilon \in (0, 1]$ a dimensionless parameter. When $0 < \varepsilon \ll 1$, the problem is equivalent to the long-time dynamics of the NKGE with small initial data (and $O(1)$ cubic nonlinearity), while the amplitude of the initial data (and the solution) is at $O(\varepsilon)$. For the long-time dynamics of the NKGE up to the time at $O(1/\varepsilon^{2})$, the resolution and error bounds of the classical numerical methods depend significantly on the small parameter $\varepsilon$, which causes severe numerical burdens as $\varepsilon \to 0^+$. The EWI-FP method is fully explicit, symmetric in time and has many superior properties in solving wave equations. By adapting the energy method combined with the method of mathematical induction, we rigorously carry out the uniform error bounds of the EWI-FP discretization at $O(h^{m_0} + \varepsilon^{2-β}τ^2)$ up to the time at $O(1/\varepsilon^β)$ with $0 \leq β\leq 2$, mesh size $h$, time step $τ$ and $m_0$ an integer depending on the regularity of the solution. By a rescaling in time, our results are straightforwardly extended to the error bounds and $\varepsilon$-scalability (or meshing strategy requirement) of the EWI-FP method for an oscillatory NKGE, whose solution propagates waves with wavelength at $O(1)$ and $O(\varepsilon^β)$ in space and time, respectively, and wave speed at $O(\varepsilon^{-β})$. Finally, extensive numerical results are reported to confirm our error estimates.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.