Paper detail

Unified Scaling of Polar Codes: Error Exponent, Scaling Exponent, Moderate Deviations, and Error Floors

Consider the transmission of a polar code of block length $N$ and rate $R$ over a binary memoryless symmetric channel $W$ and let $P_e$ be the block error probability under successive cancellation decoding. In this paper, we develop new bounds that characterize the relationship of the parameters $R$, $N$, $P_e$, and the quality of the channel $W$ quantified by its capacity $I(W)$ and its Bhattacharyya parameter $Z(W)$. In previous work, two main regimes were studied. In the error exponent regime, the channel $W$ and the rate $R<I(W)$ are fixed, and it was proved that the error probability $P_e$ scales roughly as $2^{-\sqrt{N}}$. In the scaling exponent approach, the channel $W$ and the error probability $P_e$ are fixed and it was proved that the gap to capacity $I(W)-R$ scales as $N^{-1/μ}$. Here, $μ$ is called scaling exponent and this scaling exponent depends on the channel $W$. A heuristic computation for the binary erasure channel (BEC) gives $μ=3.627$ and it was shown that, for any channel $W$, $3.579 \le μ\le 5.702$. Our contributions are as follows. First, we provide the tighter upper bound $μ\le 4.714$ valid for any $W$. With the same technique, we obtain $μ\le 3.639$ for the case of the BEC, which approaches very closely its heuristically derived value. Second, we develop a trade-off between the gap to capacity $I(W)-R$ and the error probability $P_e$ as functions of the block length $N$. In other words, we consider a moderate deviations regime in which we study how fast both quantities, as functions of the block length $N$, simultaneously go to $0$. Third, we prove that polar codes are not affected by error floors. To do so, we fix a polar code of block length $N$ and rate $R$. Then, we vary the channel $W$ and we show that the error probability $P_e$ scales as the Bhattacharyya parameter $Z(W)$ raised to a power that scales roughly like $\sqrt{N}$.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.