Paper detail

Unexpected fault activation due to underground gas storage in produced reservoirs. Part II: Definition of safe operational bandwidths

Underground gas storage is a versatile tool for managing energy resources and addressing pressing environmental concerns. While natural gas is stored in geological formations since the early 20th century, hydrogen has recently been considered as a potential candidate toward a more flexible and sustainable energy infrastructure. Furthermore, these formations can additionally capture gases that contribute to climate change, such as CO2. When such operations are implemented in faulted basins, however, safety concerns may arise due to the potential reactivation of pre-existing faults, which could trigger (micro)-seismicity events. In the Netherlands, it has been recently noted that fault reactivation can occur "unexpectedly" during the life of an underground gas storage (UGS) site, even when stress conditions are not expected to cause a failure. The present two-part work aims to develop a modeling framework to investigate the physical mechanisms causing such occurrences in previously produced gas reservoirs and define a safe operational bandwidth for pore pressure variation for UGS operations in the faulted reservoirs of the Upper Rotliegend Group, the Netherlands. This paper investigates in detail the mechanisms and crucial factors that result in fault reactivation at various stages of a UGS. The mathematical and numerical model described in Part I is used, also considering how the presence of stored gases may influence the mechanical properties of the reservoir and caprock, in particular the Young modulus. The study investigates the hazard of fault activation caused by the storage of different fluids for various purposes, such as long-term CO2 sequestration, CH4 and H2 injection and extraction cycles, and N2 injection as cushion gas. The results show how geological configuration, geomechanical properties, and reservoir operating conditions may increase the hazard of fault reactivation.

preprint2026arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access12 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.