Paper detail

Undoped and Eu, Na co-doped LiCaAlF6 scintillation crystals: paramagnetic centers, charge trapping and energy transfer properties

Single crystals of LiCaAlF6 undoped and Eu, Na co-doped were studied by electron paramagnetic resonance, radioluminescence and thermally stimulated luminescence techniques applied in a correlated manner. The undoped samples exposed to X-ray irradiation exhibited two hole-like charge trapping centers creation, the molecular ions of the form: ClF- and F2^- - F2^- dimer. Their trap depths and frequency factors were determined as follows: Et1=1.7 eV and Et2=1.1. eV for trap depths and f ~ 10^13 s-1 for frequency factor, respectively. It was found that the europium preferable charge state is 2+ in the LiCaAlF6:Eu,Na samples, however, some amount of the Eu3+ is also present. Moreover, there were two Eu2+ centers: the dominating Eu2+(Ca) and the low-content Eu2+(Li). The amount of the latter is easily governed by the sodium admixture while the former is insensitive to the Na co-doping. Eu and Na co-doping affected the defects distribution and incorporation in the LiCaAlF6 host.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access6 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.