Paper detail

Understanding thermal quenching of photoluminescence from first principles

Understanding the physical mechanisms behind thermal effects in phosphors is crucial for white light-emitting diodes (WLEDs) applications, as thermal quenching of their photoluminescence might render them useless. The two chemically close Eu-doped \Hosta and \Hostb crystals are typical phosphors studied for WLEDs. The first one sustains efficient light emission at 100$^{\circ}$C while the second one emits very little light at that temperature. Herein, we analyze from first principles their electronic structure and atomic geometry, before and after absorption/emission of light. Our results, in which the Eu-5d levels are obtained inside the band gap thanks to the removal of an electron from the 4f$^7$ shell, attributes the above-mentioned experimental difference to an auto-ionization model of the thermal quenching, based on the energy difference between Eu$_{\text{5d}}$ and the conduction band minimum. For both Eu-doped phosphors, we identify the luminescent center, and we show that the atomic relaxation in their excited state is of crucial importance for a realistic description of the emission characteristics.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access5 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.