Paper detail

Understanding the role of Ca segregation on thermal stability, electrical resistivity and mechanical strength of nanostructured aluminum

Achieving a combination of high mechanical strength and high electrical conductivity in low-weight Al alloys requires a full understanding of the relationships between nanoscaled features and physical properties. Grain boundary strengthening through grain size reduction offers some interesting possibilities but is limited by thermal stability issues. Zener pinning by stable nanoscaled particles or grain boundary segregation are well-known strategies for stabilizing grain boundaries. In this study, the Al-Ca system has been selected to investigate the way segregation affects the combination of mechanical strength and electrical resistivity. For this purpose, an Al-Ca composite material was severely deformed by high-pressure torsion to achieve a nanoscaled structure with a mean grain size of only 25 nm. X-ray diffraction, transmission electron microscopy and atom probe tomography data revealed that the fcc Ca phase was dissolved for large levels of plastic deformation leading mainly to Ca segregations along crystalline defects. The resulting microhardness of about 300 HV is much higher than predictions based on Hall and Petch Law and is attributed to limited grain boundary mediated plasticity due to Ca segregation. The electrical resistivity is also much higher than that expected for nanostructured Al. The main contribution comes from Ca segregations that lead to a fraction of electrons reflected or trapped by grain boundaries twice larger than in pure Al. The two-phase state was investigated by in-situ and ex-situ microscopy after annealing at 200{\textdegree}C for 30 min, where precipitation of nanoscaled Al4Ca particles occurred and the mean grain size reached 35 nm. Annealing also significantly decreased electrical resistivity, but it remained much higher than that of nanostructured pure Al, due to Al/Al4Ca interfaces that reflect or trap more than 85% of electrons.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.