Paper detail

Understanding the $\rm C_3H_2$ cyclic-to-linear ratio in L1544

Aims. We aim to understand the high cyclic-to-linear $\rm C_3H_2$ ratio ($32 \pm 4$) observed toward L1544 by Spezzano et al. (2016). Methods. We combine a gas-grain chemical model with a physical model for L1544 to simulate the column densities of cyclic and linear $\rm C_3H_2$ observed toward L1544. The most important reactions for the formation and destruction of both forms of $\rm C_3H_2$ are identified, and their relative rate coefficients are varied to find the best match to the observations. Results. We find that the ratio of the rate coefficients of $\rm C_3H_3^+ + e^- \longrightarrow C_3H_2 + H$ for cyclic and linear $\rm C_3H_2$ must be $\sim 20$ in order to reproduce the observations, depending on the branching ratios assumed for the $\rm C_3H_3^+ + e^- \longrightarrow C_3H + H_2$ reaction. In current astrochemical networks it is assumed that cyclic and linear $\rm C_3H_2$ are formed in a 1:1 ratio in the aforementioned reactions. Laboratory studies and/or theoretical calculations are needed to confirm the results of our chemical modeling based on observational constraints.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.