Paper detail

Understanding Sea Ice Melting via Functional Data Analysis

In this article, we considered the problem of sea ice cover is melting. Considering the `satellite passive microwave remote sensing data' as functional data, we studied daily observation of sea ice cover of each year as a smooth continuous function of time. We investigated the mean function for the sea ice area for following decades and computed the corresponding $95\%$ bootstrap confidence interval for the both Arctic and Antarctic Oceans. We found the mean function for the sea ice area dropped statistically significantly in recent decades for the Arctic Ocean. However, no such statistical evidence was found for the Antarctic ocean. Essentially, the mean function for sea ice area in the Antarctic Ocean is unchanged. Additional evidence of the melting of sea ice area in the Arctic Ocean is provided by three types of phase curve (namely, Area vs. Velocity, Area vs. Acceleration, and Velocity Vs. Acceleration). In the Arctic Ocean, during the summer, the current decades is observing the size of the sea ice area about $30\%$ less, than what it used to be during the first decade. In this article, we have taken a distribution-free approach for our analysis, except the data generating process, belongs to the Hilbert space.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.