Paper detail

Understanding Dual AGN Activation in the Nearby Universe

We study the fraction of dual AGN in a sample of 167 nearby (z<0.05), moderate luminosity, ultra hard X-ray selected AGN from the all-sky Swift BAT survey. Combining new Chandra and Gemini observations together with optical and X-ray observations, we find that the dual AGN frequency at scales <100 kpc is 10% (16/167). Of the 16 dual AGN, 3 (19%) were detected using X-ray spectroscopy and were not detected using emission line diagnostics. Close dual AGN (<30 kpc) tend to be more common among the most X-ray luminous systems. In dual AGN, the X-ray luminosity of both AGN increases strongly with decreasing galaxy separation, suggesting that the merging event is key in powering both AGN. 50% of the AGN with a very close companion (<15 kpc), are dual AGN. We also find that dual AGN are more likely to occur in major mergers and tend to avoid absorption line galaxies with elliptical morphologies. Finally, we find SDSS Seyferts are much less likely than BAT AGN (0.25% vs. 7.8%) to be found in dual AGN at scales <30 kpc because of a smaller number of companions galaxies, fiber collision limits, a tendency for AGN at small separations to be detected only in X-rays, and a higher fraction of dual AGN companions with increasing AGN luminosity.

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access6 authors3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.