Paper detail

Understanding and Minimizing $V_{OC}$ Losses in All-Perovskite Tandem Photovoltaics

All-perovskite tandem solar cells promise high photovoltaic performance at low cost. So far however, their efficiencies cannot compete with traditional inorganic multi-junction solar cells and they generally underperform in comparison to what is expected from the isolated single junction devices. Understanding performance losses in all-perovskite tandem solar cells is a crucial aspect that will accelerate advancement. Here, we perform extensive selective characterization of the individual sub-cells to disentangle the different losses and limiting factors in these tandem devices. We find that non-radiative losses in the high-gap subcell dominate the overall recombination losses in our baseline system as well as in the majority of literature reports. We consecutively improve the high-gap perovskite subcell through a multi-faceted approach, allowing us to enhance the open-circuit voltage ($V_{OC}$) of the subcell by up to 120 mV. Due to the (quasi) lossless indium oxide interconnect which we employ for the first time in all-perovskite tandems, the $V_{OC}$ improvements achieved in the high-gap perovskites translate directly to improved all-perovskite tandem solar cells with a champion $V_{OC}$ of 2.00 V and a stabilized efficiency of 23.7%. The efficiency potential of our optimized all-perovskite tandems reaches 25.2% and 27.0% when determined from electro- and photo-luminescence respectively, indicating significant transport losses as well as imperfect energy-alignment between the perovskite and the transport layers in the experimental devices. Further improvements to 28.4% are possible considering the bulk quality of both absorbers measured using photo-luminescence on isolated perovskite layers. Our insights therefore not only show an optimization example but a generalizable evidence-based strategy for optimization utilizing optical sub-cell characterization.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access12 authors3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.