Paper detail

Understanding and improving the Effective Mass for LHC searches

A handy and extensively used kinematic variable in LHC analyses, especially for golden SUSY signals of multijets plus missing energy, is the Effective Mass, M_eff = sum_j |p_T^j|+ |p_T^miss|. Empirically, the value of M_eff at which the histogram of events has a maximum is correlated with the SUSY spectrum, M_eff|_max ~ 80% M_susy, where M_susy is essentially the sum of the masses of the SUSY particles initially created. In this paper we explain the reason for such strong correlation, pointing out the cases where the correlation is not good. Besides, we propose a new variable, the Effective Transverse Energy, E_T^eff, which shows an even better and more direct correlation E_T^eff|_max ~ M_susy, and is independent of the procedure followed to identify the jets. E_T^eff and M_eff are complementary variables, rather than competitors; and plotting histograms in both can be useful to cross-check the results, allowing a better and more robust identification of M_susy. The extension of this procedure to other scenarios of new physics (not necessarily SUSY) is straightforward.

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.