Paper detail

Unconditionally stable time splitting methods for the electrostatic analysis of solvated biomolecules

This work introduces novel unconditionally stable operator splitting methods for solving the time dependent nonlinear Poisson-Boltzmann (NPB) equation for the electrostatic analysis of solvated biomolecules. In a pseudo-transient continuation solution of the NPB equation, a long time integration is needed to reach the steady state. This calls for time stepping schemes that are stable and accurate for large time increments. The existing alternating direction implicit (ADI) methods for the NPB equation are known to be conditionally stable, although being fully implicit. To overcome this difficulty, we propose several new operator splitting schemes, in both multiplicative and additive styles, including locally one-dimensional (LOD) schemes and additive operator splitting (AOS) schemes. The proposed schemes become much more stable than the ADI methods, and some of them are indeed unconditionally stable in dealing with solvated proteins with source singularities and non-smooth solutions. Numerically, the orders of convergence in both space and time are found to be one. Nevertheless, the precision in calculating the electrostatic free energy is low, unless a small time increment is used. Further accuracy improvements are thus considered. After acceleration, the optimized LOD method can produce a reliable energy estimate by integrating for a small and fixed number of time steps. Since one only needs to solve a tridiagonal linear system in each independent one dimensional process, the overall computation is very efficient. The unconditionally stable LOD method scales linearly with respect to the number of atoms in the protein studies, and is over 20 times faster than the conditionally stable ADI methods.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.