Paper detail

Uncertainty Quantification of Discrete Association Problems in Image Sequence-based Tracking

Applications, ranging from tracking molecular motion within cells to analyzing complex animal foraging behavior, require algorithms for associating a collection of spot-like particles in one image with particles contained in another image. These associations are often made via network flow algorithms. However, it is often the case that many candidate association solutions (the output of network flow algorithms) have nearly optimal scores; in this case, the optimal assignment solution is of dubious quality. Algorithms for reliably computing the uncertainty of candidate association solutions are under-developed in situations where many particles are tracked over multiple frames of data. This is due in part to the fact that exact uncertainty quantification (UQ) in large association problems is computationally intractable because the exact computation exhibits exponential dependence on the number of particles tracked. We introduce a technique that can accurately and efficiently quantify association ambiguity (i.e., UQ for discrete association problems) without requiring the evaluation of the cost of each feasible association solution. Our method can readily be wrapped around existing tracking algorithms and can efficiently handle a variety of 2D association problems. The applications presented are focused on tracking molecules in live cells. Our method is validated via both simulations and experiments. The experimental applications aim to accurately form tracks and quantify diffusion of quantum dot labeled proteins from \emph{in vivo} measurements; here association problems involving cost matrices possessing hundreds to thousands of rows/columns are encountered. For such large-scale problems, we discuss how our approach can efficiently and accurately quantify inherent uncertainty in candidate data associations.

preprint2013arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.