Paper detail

Uncertainty Quantification of DFT-predicted Finite Temperature Thermodynamic Properties within the Debye Model

Finite-temperature effects can be included by calculating the vibrations properties and this can greatly improve the fidelity of computational screening. An important challenge for DFT-based screening is the sensitivity of the predictions to the choice of the exchange correlation function. In this work, we rigorously explore the sensitivity of finite temperature thermodynamic properties to the choice of the exchange correlation functional using the built-in error estimation capabilities within the Bayesian Error Estimation Functional. The vibrational properties are estimated using the Debye model and we quantify the uncertainty associated with finite-temperature properties for a diverse collection of materials. We find good agreement with experiment and small spread in predictions over different exchange correlation functionals for Mg, Al$_2$O$_3$, Al, Ca, and GaAs. In the case of Li, Li$_2$O, and NiO, however, we find a large spread in predictions as well as disagreement between experiment and functionals due to complex bonding environments. While the energetics generated by BEEF-vdW ensemble is typically normal, the complex mapping through the Debye model leads to the derived finite temperature properties having non-Gaussian behavior. We test a wide variety of probability distributions that best represent the finite temperature distribution and find that properties such as specific heat, Gibbs free energy, entropy, and the thermal expansion coefficient are well described by normal or transformed normal distributions, while the prediction spread of volume at a given temperature does not appear to be drawn from a single distribution.

preprint2019arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.