Paper detail

Uncertainty-Guided Mutual Consistency Learning for Semi-Supervised Medical Image Segmentation

Medical image segmentation is a fundamental and critical step in many clinical approaches. Semi-supervised learning has been widely applied to medical image segmentation tasks since it alleviates the heavy burden of acquiring expert-examined annotations and takes the advantage of unlabeled data which is much easier to acquire. Although consistency learning has been proven to be an effective approach by enforcing an invariance of predictions under different distributions, existing approaches cannot make full use of region-level shape constraint and boundary-level distance information from unlabeled data. In this paper, we propose a novel uncertainty-guided mutual consistency learning framework to effectively exploit unlabeled data by integrating intra-task consistency learning from up-to-date predictions for self-ensembling and cross-task consistency learning from task-level regularization to exploit geometric shape information. The framework is guided by the estimated segmentation uncertainty of models to select out relatively certain predictions for consistency learning, so as to effectively exploit more reliable information from unlabeled data. Experiments on two publicly available benchmark datasets showed that: 1) Our proposed method can achieve significant performance improvement by leveraging unlabeled data, with up to 4.13% and 9.82% in Dice coefficient compared to supervised baseline on left atrium segmentation and brain tumor segmentation, respectively. 2) Compared with other semi-supervised segmentation methods, our proposed method achieve better segmentation performance under the same backbone network and task settings on both datasets, demonstrating the effectiveness and robustness of our method and potential transferability for other medical image segmentation tasks.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.