Paper detail

Uncertainties in The Interstellar Extinction Curve and the Cepheid Distance to M101

I revisit the Cepheid-distance determination to the nearby spiral galaxy M101 (Pinwheel Galaxy) of Shappee & Stanek (2011), in light of several recent investigations questioning the shape of the interstellar extinction curve at $λ\approx 8,000$ Å(i.e. I-band). I find that the relatively steep extinction ratio $A_{I}/E(V-I)=1.1450$ (Fitzpatrick & Massa 2007) is slightly favoured relative to $A_{I}/E(V-I)=1.2899$ (Fitzpatrick 1999) and significantly favoured relative the historically canonical value of $A_{I}/E(V-I)=1.4695$ (Cardelli et al. 1989). The steeper extinction curves, with lower values of $A_{I}/E(V-I)$, yield fits with reduced scatter, metallicity-dependences to the dereddened Cepheid luminosities that are closer to values inferred in the local group, and that are less sensitive to the choice of reddening cut imposed in the sample selection. The increase in distance modulus to M101 when using the preferred extinction curve is $Δμ \sim 0.06$ mag, resulting in an estimate of the distance modulus to M101 relative to the LMC of $ Δμ_{\rm{LMC}} \approx 10.72 \pm 0.03$ (stat). The best-fit metallicity-dependence is $dM_{I}/d\rm{[O/H]} \approx (-0.38 \pm 0.14$ (stat)) mag dex$^{-1}$.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.