Unbiased Differential Size Evolution and the Inside-Out Growth of Galaxies in the Deep CANDELS GOODS Fields at 1≤z≤71 \leq z \leq 7

preprint2019arXivOpen access

Abstract

We present a size analysis of a sample of ∼\sim 49,000 galaxies from the CANDELS GOODS North and South fields using redshift-independent relative surface brightness metrics to determine an unbiased measure of the differential size evolution of galaxies at 1≤z≤71 \leq z \leq 7. We introduce a novel method of removing foreground objects from distant galaxy (z>3z > 3) images that makes use of the Lyman-break at 912Å, in what we call `2-D Lyman-Break Imaging'. The images used are in the rest-frame optical at z<3z < 3 and progressively bluer bands at z>3z > 3. They are therefore subject to K-correction and cosmological dimming effects which are tested and corrected for. We separately consider a mass-selected sample (with masses in the range 109^9M⊙_{\odot}≤\leqM∗_*≤\leq1010.5^{10.5}M⊙_{\odot}) and a number density selected sample (using a constant number density of n=1×10−4n = 1\times10^{-4}Mpc−3^{-3}). Instead of utilising the commonly used, but potentially biased, effective radii for size measurements, we measure the redshift-independent Petrosian radius, defined by the parameter ηη, for each galaxy for three values of ηη and use this as a proxy for size. The evolution of the measured radii can be described by a power-law of the form RPetr=α(1+z)βR_{Petr} = α(1+z)^βkpc where β<0β< 0. We find that the outer radius increases more rapidly, suggesting that as a galaxy grows mass is added to its outer regions via an inside-out growth. This growth is stronger for the number density selected sample, with a growth rate of nearly three in the outer radii compared to the inner. We test and confirm these results using a series of image simulations.

Explore this paper’s authors, topics and related work.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Reviews 0

Write a reviewWrite

No reviews yet.

Discussion 0

Add a commentWrite

No comments yet.