Paper detail

Ultraviolet variability of the mCP star 56 Arietis

The spectrophotometric variability of the mCP star 56 Ari in the far-UV spectral region from 1150 Å to 1980 Å is investigated. This study is based on the archival {\it IUE} data obtained at different phases of the rotational cycle. The brightness of 56 Ari is not constant in the investigated wavelengths over the whole rotational period. The monochromatic light curves continuously change their shape with wavelength. The comparison of energy distributions at three phases show that the first minimum of light curves at phase 0.25 is replaced by the maximum for $λ>$1608Å, but the second minimum of light curves at phase 0.65 absent in the spectral region between $λ$1938Å and $λ$1980Å. The variable broad features in the far-UV connected with a non-uniform distribution of silicon over the surface of 56 Ari influence substantially the light variations in the UV.

preprint2010arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.