Paper detail

Ultraviolet Spectropolarimetry with Polstar: Clumping and Mass-loss Rate Corrections

The most massive stars are thought to lose a significant fraction of their mass in a steady wind during the main-sequence and blue supergiant phases. This in turn sets the stage for their further evolution and eventual supernova, with consequences for ISM energization and chemical enrichment. Understanding these processes requires accurate observational constraints on the mass-loss rates of the most luminous stars, which can also be used to test theories of stellar wind generation. In the past, mass-loss rates have been characterized via collisional emission processes such as H$α$ and free-free radio emission, but these so-called "density squared" diagnostics require correction in the presence of widespread clumping. Recent observational and theoretical evidence points to the likelihood of a ubiquitously high level of such clumping in hot-star winds, but quantifying its effects requires a deeper understanding of the complex dynamics of radiatively driven winds. Furthermore, large-scale structures arising from surface anisotropies and propagating throughout the wind can further complicate the picture by introducing further density enhancements, affecting mass-loss diagnostics. Time series spectroscopy of UV resonance lines with high resolution and high signal-to-noise are required to better understand this complex dynamics, and help correct "density squared" diagnostics of mass-loss rates. The proposed Polstar mission easily provides the necessary resolution at the sound-speed scale of 20 km s$^{-1}$, on three dozen bright targets with signal-to noise an order of magnitude above that of the celebrated IUE MEGA campaign, via continuous observations that track structures advecting through the wind in real time.

preprint2021arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access16 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.