Paper detail

Ultramassive dense early-type galaxies: velocity dispersions and number density evolution since z=1.6

In this paper we investigate the mass assembly history of ultramassive (Mstar > 10^11Msun) dense (Sigma = Mstar/(2*pi*Re^2) > 2500 Msun/pc^2) early-type galaxies (ETGs) over the last 9 Gyr. We have traced the evolution of the number density rho of ultramassive dense ETGs and have compared their structural (effective radius Re and stellar mass Mstar) and dynamical (velocity dispersion sigma_e) parameters over the redshift range 0 < z < 1.6. We have derived the number density at 1.6 < z < 1 from the MUNICS and GOODS-South surveys, while we have used the COSMOS and SDSS spectroscopic surveys to probe the intermediate and local redshift range. For the comparison of the dynamical and structural parameters, we have collected the ultramassive dense ETGs at 1.2 < z < 1.6 for which velocity dispersion measurements are available (11 ETGs). For 4 of them we present unpublished estimates of sigma_e. We probe the intermediate redshift range, and the local universe using the samples of ETGs by Saglia et al. (2010), Zahid et al. (2015), and by Thomas et al. (2010). We find that the number density of ultramassive dense ETGs evolves as rho(z) = K*(1 + z)^(0.3\pm0.8) implying a decrease of ~ 25% of the population since z = 1.6. By comparing the values of Re, Mstar, and sigma_e of ultramassive dense ETGs over the range 0 < z < 1.6 we find that all the high-z ETGs have a counterpart in the local universe. This implies either that the majority (~70%) of ultramassive dense ETGs has already completed its assembly and its shaping at <z> = 1.4, or that, if a significant fraction of them evolves in size, new ultramassive dense ETGs must form at z < 1.5 to maintain their number density almost constant. The difficulty into identify good progenitors for these new dense ETGs at z < 1.5, and the stellar populations properties of local ultramassive dense ETGs point toward the first hypothesis.

preprint2016arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.