Paper detail

Ultra-soft sources as supernova type Ia progenitors

Missing from the usual considerations of nuclear burning white dwarfs as Type Ia supernova progenitors are systems with very higher mass transfer rates, where more material than is needed for steady burning accretes on the white dwarf. This will move out the photosphere of the white dwarf, causing it to emit at longer wavelengths. Thus, we propose the name ultra-soft source (USS) for these objects. We present a VLT/FLAMES survey looking for USS in the SMC, selected to be bright in the far UV and with blue far UV-V colors. While we find some unusual objects, and recover known planetary nebula and WR stars, we detect no objects with strong He II lines, which should be a signature of USS. This null result either puts an upper limit on the number of USS in the SMC, or shows that we do not understand what the optical spectra of such objects will look like. We also discuss the unusual LMC [WN] planetary nebula LMC N66 as a possible example of an USS. It has a luminosity consistent with that expected, and its spectra show incompletely CNO-processed material - strong helium lines, some hydrogen, enhanced nitrogen and depleted carbon. It also shows periodic outbursts. USS may resemble N66 in quiescence. However, it lacks a FUV excess, contrary to our predictions.

preprint2011arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.