Paper detail

Ultra-short-period Planets are Stable Against Tidal Inspiral

It has been unambiguously shown in both individual systems and at the population level that hot Jupiters experience tidal inspiral before the end of their host stars' main sequence lifetimes. Ultra-short-period (USP) planets have orbital periods $P < 1$ day, rocky compositions, and are expected to experience tidal decay on similar timescales to hot Jupiters if the efficiency of tidal dissipation inside their host stars parameterized as $Q_\ast'$ is independent of $P$ and/or secondary mass $M_{\mathrm{p}}$. Any difference between the two classes of systems would reveal that a constant $Q_\ast'$ model is insufficient. If USP planets experience tidal inspiral, then USP planet systems will be relatively young compared to similar stars without USP planets. Because it is a proxy for relative age, we calculate the Galactic velocity dispersions of USP planet candidate host and non-host stars using data from Gaia Data Release 2 supplemented with ground-based radial velocities. We find that main sequence USP planet candidate host stars have kinematics consistent with similar stars in the Kepler field without observed USP planets. This indicates that USP planet hosts have similar ages as field stars and that USP planets do not experience tidal inspiral during the main sequence lifetimes of their host stars. The survival of USP planets requires that $Q_\ast'\gtrsim10^7$ at $P\approx0.7$ day and $M_{\mathrm{p}}\approx2.6~M_{\oplus}$. This result demands that $Q_\ast'$ depend on the orbital period and/or mass of the secondary in the range $0.5\mathrm{~days}\lesssim P\lesssim5$ days and $1~M_{\oplus}\lesssim M_{\mathrm{p}}\lesssim1000~M_{\oplus}$.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.