Paper detail

UAVs over mmWave/THz Cellular MEC Networks: A Comparative Study for Energy Efficiency

Cellular networks equipped with mobile edge computing (MEC) servers can be beneficial for unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) with limited onboard computation power and battery life-time. In this paper, we compare energy consumption of a UAV connected to cellular MEC servers in various possible scenarios such as onboard/MEC processing or parallel computation. Using detailed 3GPP-based modelings, we provide quantitative understanding of the most energy efficient approach and its relation with communication technologies, computation factors, and mobility parameters. Our findings show that, across the different frequencies from sub-6GHz to THz bands, the mmWave cellular MEC network is more energy efficient than UAV's onborad processing for a broader range of network densities. Secondly, while the UAV propulsion power consumption is non-decreasing function of velocity, the UAV movement cost yet can be optimized to further provide remarkable energy savings as compared to hovering. Finally, our results show that the most energy efficient approach can be obtained if mobility of UAV is combined with efficient parallel onboard-MEC processing.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.