Paper detail

U-Net Based Architecture for an Improved Multiresolution Segmentation in Medical Images

Purpose: Manual medical image segmentation is an exhausting and time-consuming task along with high inter-observer variability. In this study, our objective is to improve the multi-resolution image segmentation performance of U-Net architecture. Approach: We have proposed a fully convolutional neural network for image segmentation in a multi-resolution framework. We used U-Net as the base architecture and modified that to improve its image segmentation performance. In the proposed architecture (mrU-Net), the input image and its down-sampled versions were used as the network inputs. We added more convolution layers to extract features directly from the down-sampled images. We trained and tested the network on four different medical datasets, including skin lesion photos, lung computed tomography (CT) images (LUNA dataset), retina images (DRIVE dataset), and prostate magnetic resonance (MR) images (PROMISE12 dataset). We compared the performance of mrU-Net to U-Net under similar training and testing conditions. Results: Comparing the results to manual segmentation labels, mrU-Net achieved average Dice similarity coefficients of 70.6%, 97.9%, 73.6%, and 77.9% for the skin lesion, LUNA, DRIVE, and PROMISE12 segmentation, respectively. For the skin lesion, LUNA, and DRIVE datasets, mrU-Net outperformed U-Net with significantly higher accuracy and for the PROMISE12 dataset, both networks achieved similar accuracy. Furthermore, using mrU-Net led to a faster training rate on LUNA and DRIVE datasets when compared to U-Net. Conclusions: The striking feature of the proposed architecture is its higher capability in extracting image-derived features compared to U-Net. mrU-Net illustrated a faster training rate and slightly more accurate image segmentation compared to U-Net.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.