Paper detail

U-duality transformation of membrane on $T^{n}$ revisited

The problem with the U-duality transformation of membrane on $T^{n}$ is recently addressed in [arXiv:1509.02915 [hep-th]]. We will consider the U-duality transformation rule of membrane on $T^{n}\times R$. It turns out that winding modes on $T^{n}$ should be taken into account, since the duality transformation may bring the membrane configuration without winding modes into the one with winding modes. With the winding modes added, the membrane worldvolume theory in lightcone gauge is equivalent to the $n+1$ dimensional super-Yang-Mills (SYM) theory in $\tilde{T}^{n}$, which has $SL(2,Z)\times SL(3,Z)$ and $SL(5,Z)$ symmetries for $n=3$ and $n=4$, respectively. The $SL(2,Z)\times SL(3,Z)$ transformation can be realized classically, making the on-shell field configurations transformed into each other. However, the $SL(5,Z)$ symmetry may only be realized at the quantum level, since the classical $5d$ SYM field configurations cannot form the representation of $SL(5,Z)$.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.