Paper detail

Typical sumsets of linear codes

Given two identical linear codes $\mathcal C$ over $\mathbb F_q$ of length $n$, we independently pick one codeword from each codebook uniformly at random. A $\textit{sumset}$ is formed by adding these two codewords entry-wise as integer vectors and a sumset is called $\textit{typical}$, if the sum falls inside this set with high probability. We ask the question: how large is the typical sumset for most codes? In this paper we characterize the asymptotic size of such typical sumset. We show that when the rate $R$ of the linear code is below a certain threshold $D$, the typical sumset size is roughly $|\mathcal C|^2=2^{2nR}$ for most codes while when $R$ is above this threshold, most codes have a typical sumset whose size is roughly $|\mathcal C|\cdot 2^{nD}=2^{n(R+D)}$ due to the linear structure of the codes. The threshold $D$ depends solely on the alphabet size $q$ and takes value in $[1/2, \log \sqrt{e})$. More generally, we completely characterize the asymptotic size of typical sumsets of two nested linear codes $\mathcal C_1, \mathcal C_2$ with different rates. As an application of the result, we study the communication problem where the integer sum of two codewords is to be decoded through a general two-user multiple-access channel.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.