Paper detail

Typical structure of hereditary graph families. II. Exotic examples

A graph $G$ is $H$-free if it does not contain an induced subgraph isomorphic to $H$. The study of the typical structure of $H$-free graphs was initiated by Erdős, Kleitman and Rothschild, who have shown that almost all $C_3$-free graphs are bipartite. Since then the typical structure of $H$-free graphs has been determined for several families of graphs $H$, including complete graphs, trees and cycles. Recently, Reed and Scott proposed a conjectural description of the typical structure of $H$-free graphs for all graphs $H$, which extends all previously known results in the area. We construct an infinite family of graphs for which the Reed-Scott conjecture fails, and use the methods we developed in the prequel paper to describe the typical structure of $H$-free graphs for graphs $H$ in this family. Using similar techniques, we construct an infinite family of graphs $H$ for which the maximum size of a homogenous set in a typical $H$-free graph is sublinear in the number of vertices, answering a question of Loebl et al. and Kang et al.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.