Paper detail

Typical Sequences for Polish Alphabets

The notion of typical sequences plays a key role in the theory of information. Central to the idea of typicality is that a sequence $x_1, x_2, ..., x_n$ that is $P_X$-typical should, loosely speaking, have an empirical distribution that is in some sense close to the distribution $P_X$. The two most common notions of typicality are that of strong (letter) typicality and weak (entropy) typicality. While weak typicality allows one to apply many arguments that can be made with strongly typical arguments, some arguments for strong typicality cannot be generalized to weak typicality. In this paper, we consider an alternate definition of typicality, namely one based on the weak* topology and that is applicable to Polish alphabets (which includes $\reals^n$). This notion is a generalization of strong typicality in the sense that it degenerates to strong typicality in the finite alphabet case, and can also be applied to mixed and continuous distributions. Furthermore, it is strong enough to prove a Markov lemma, and thus can be used to directly prove a more general class of results than weak typicality. As an example of this technique, we directly prove achievability for Gel'fand-Pinsker channels with input constraints for a large class of alphabets and channels without first proving a finite alphabet result and then resorting to delicate quantization arguments. While this large class does not include Gaussian distributions with power constraints, it is shown to be straightforward to recover this case by considering a sequence of truncated Gaussian distributions.

preprint2010arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.