Paper detail

Typical points of univoque sets

Given a positive integer $M$ and a real number $q>1$, we consider the univoque set $\mathcal{U}_q$ of reals which have a unique $q$-expansion over the alphabet $\set{0,1,\cdots,M}$. In this paper we show that for any $x\in\mathcal{U}_q$ and all sufficiently small $\varepsilon>0$ the Hausdorff dimension $\dim_H\mathcal{U}_q\cap(x-\varepsilon, x+\varepsilon)$ equals either $\dim_H\mathcal{U}_q$ {or} zero. Moreover, we give a complete description of the typical points $x\in\mathcal{U}_q$ which satisfy \[ \dim_H\mathcal{U}_q\cap(x-\varepsilon, x+\varepsilon)=\dim_H\mathcal{U}_q\quad\textrm{for any}\quad \varepsilon>0, \] and prove that the set of typical points of $\mathcal{U}_q$ has full Hausdorff dimension. In particular, we show that if $\mathcal{U}_q$ is a Cantor set, then all points of $\mathcal{U}_q$ are typical points. This strengthen a result of de Vries and Komornik (Adv. Math., 2009).

preprint2015arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.