Paper detail

Typical knots: size, link component count, and writhe

We model the typical behavior of knots and links using grid diagrams. Links are ubiquitous in the sciences, and their "normal" or "typical" behavior is of significant importance in understanding situations such as the topological state of DNA or the statistical mechanics of ring polymers. We examine three invariants: the expected size of a random knot; the expected number of components of a random link; and the expected writhe of a random knot. We investigate the first two numerically and produce generating functions which codify the observed patterns: knot size is uniformly distributed and linearly dependent upon grid size, and the number of components follows a distribution whose mean and variance grow with log_2 of grid size; in particular, for any fixed k, the k-component links grow vanishingly rare as grid size increases. Finally, we observe that the odd moments of writhe vanish, and we perform an exploratory data analysis to discover that variance grows with the square of grid size and kurtosis is constant at approximately 3.5. We continue this project in a future work, where we investigate genus and the effects of crossing change on it.

preprint2021arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author4 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.