Paper detail

Type III Responses to Transient Inputs in Hybrid Nonlinear Neuron Models

Experimental characterization of neuronal dynamics involves recording both of spontaneous activity patterns and of responses to transient and sustained inputs. While much theoretical attention has been devoted to the spontaneous activity of neurons, less is known about the dynamic mechanisms shaping their responses to transient inputs, although these bear significant physiological relevance. Here, we study responses to transient inputs in a widely used class of neuron models (nonlinear adaptive hybrid models) well-known to reproduce a number of biologically realistic behaviors. We focus on responses to transient inputs that have been previously associated with Type III neurons, arguably the least studied category in Hodgkin's classification, which are those neurons that never exhibit continuous firing in response to sustained excitatory currents. The two phenomena that we study are post-inhibitory facilitation, in which an otherwise subthreshold excitatory input can induce a spike if it is applied with proper timing after an inhibitory pulse, and slope detection, in which a neuron spikes to a transient input only when the input's rate of change is in a specific, bounded range. We analyze the origin of these phenomena in nonlinear hybrid models and provide a geometric characterization of dynamical structures associated with PIF in the system and an analytical study of slope detection for tent inputs. While the necessary and sufficient conditions for these behaviors are easily satisfied in neurons with Type III excitability, our proofs are quite general and valid for neurons that do not exhibit Type III excitability as well. This study therefore provides a framework for the mathematical analysis of these responses to transient inputs associated with Type III neurons in other systems and for advancing our understanding of these systems' computational properties.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.