Paper detail

Type-2 fuzzy reliability redundancy allocation problem and its solution using particle swarm optimization algorithm

In this paper, the fuzzy multi-objective reliability redundancy allocation problem (FMORRAP) is proposed, which maximizes the system reliability while simultaneously minimizing the system cost under the type 2 fuzzy uncertainty. In the proposed formulation, the higher order uncertainties (such as parametric, manufacturing, environmental, and designers uncertainty) associated with the system are modeled with interval type 2 fuzzy sets (IT2 FS). The footprint of uncertainty of the interval type 2 membership functions (IT2 MFs) accommodates these uncertainties by capturing the multiple opinions from several system experts. We consider IT2 MFs to represent the subsystem reliability and cost, which are to be further aggregated using extension principle to evaluate the total system reliability and cost according to their configurations, i.e., series parallel and parallel series. We proposed a particle swarm optimization (PSO) based novel solution approach to solve the FMORRAP. To demonstrate the applicability of two formulations, namely, series parallel FMORRAP and parallel series FMORRAP, we performed experimental simulations on various numerical data sets. The decision makers/system experts assign different importance to the objectives (system reliability and cost), and these preferences are represented by sets of weights. The optimal results are obtained from our solution approach, and the Pareto optimal front is established using these different weight sets. The genetic algorithm (GA) was implemented to compare the results obtained from our proposed solution approach. A statistical analysis was conducted between PSO and GA, and it was found that the PSO based Pareto solution outperforms the GA.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.