Paper detail

Two-way Networks: when Adaptation is Useless

In two-way networks, nodes act as both sources and destinations of messages. This allows for "adaptation" at or "interaction" between the nodes - a node's channel inputs may be functions of its message(s) and previously received signals. How to best adapt is key to two-way communication, rendering it challenging. However, examples exist of point-to-point channels where adaptation is not beneficial from a capacity perspective. We ask whether analogous examples exist for multi-user two-way networks. We first consider deterministic two-way channel models: the binary modulo-2 addition channel and a generalization thereof, and the linear deterministic channel. For these deterministic models we obtain the capacity region for the two-way multiple access/broadcast channel, the two-way Z channel and the two-way interference channel (IC). In all cases we permit all nodes to adapt channel inputs to past outputs (except for portions of the linear deterministic two-way IC where we only permit 2 of the 4 nodes to fully adapt). However, we show that this adaptation is useless from a capacity region perspective and capacity is achieved by strategies where the channel inputs at each use do not adapt to previous inputs. Finally, we consider the Gaussian two-way IC, and show that partial adaptation is useless when the interference is very strong. In the strong and weak interference regimes, we show that the non-adaptive Han and Kobayashi scheme utilized in parallel in both directions achieves to within a constant gap for the symmetric rate of the fully (some regimes) or partially (remaining regimes) adaptive models. The central technical contribution is the derivation of new, computable outer bounds which allow for adaptation. Inner bounds follow from non-adaptive achievability schemes of the corresponding one-way channel models.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.