Paper detail

Two temperate Earth- and Neptune-sized planets orbiting fully convective M dwarfs

As the diversity of exoplanets continues to grow, it is important to revisit assumptions about habitability and classical HZ definitions. In this work, we introduce an expanded &#39;temperate&#39; zone, defined by instellation fluxes between $0.1<S/\mathrm{S}_\oplus<5$, thus encompassing a broader range of potentially habitable worlds. We also introduce the TEMPOS survey, which aims to produce a catalogue of precise radii for temperate planets orbiting M dwarfs with $T_\mathrm{eff}\leq3400\,$ K. This work reports the discovery and characterisation of two planets in this temperate regime orbiting mid-type M dwarfs: TOI-6716\,b, a $0.98\pm0.07\,\mathrm{R}_\oplus$ planet orbiting its M4 host star ($R_\star=0.231\,\pm0.015\mathrm{R}_\odot$, $M_\star=0.223\pm0.011\,\mathrm{M}_\odot$, $T_\mathrm{eff}=3110\pm80\,\mathrm{K}$) with a period $P=4.7185898^{+0.0000054}_{-0.0000041}\,\mathrm{d}$, and TOI-7384 b, a $3.56\pm0.21\,\mathrm{R}_\oplus$ planet orbiting an M4 ($R_\star=0.319\,\pm0.018\mathrm{R}_\odot$, $M_\star=0.318\pm0.016\,\mathrm{M}_\odot$, $T_\mathrm{eff}=3185\pm75\,\mathrm{K}$) star every $P=6.2340258^{+0.0000034}_{-0.0000036}\,\mathrm{d}$. The radii of TOI-6716 b and TOI-7384 b have precisions of $6.8\%$ and $5.9\%$ respectively. We validate these planets with multi-band ground-based photometric observations, high-resolution imaging and statistical analyses. We find these planets to have instellation fluxes close to the inner (hotter) edge of the temperate zone, with $4.4\pm1.1\,\mathrm{S}_\oplus$ and $4.9\pm1.1\,\mathrm{S}_\oplus$ for TOI-6716 b and TOI-7384 b respectively. Also, with a predicted TSM similar to the TRAPPIST-1 planets, TOI-6716 b is likely to be a good rocky-world JWST target, should it have retained its atmosphere.

preprint2026arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.