Paper detail

Two Standard Decks of Playing Cards are Sufficient for a ZKP for Sudoku

Sudoku is a famous logic puzzle where the player has to fill a number between 1 and 9 into each empty cell of a $9 \times 9$ grid such that every number appears exactly once in each row, each column, and each $3 \times 3$ block. In 2020, Sasaki et al. developed a physical card-based protocol of zero-knowledge proof (ZKP) for Sudoku, which enables a prover to convince a verifier that he/she knows a solution of the puzzle without revealing it. Their protocol uses 90 cards, but requires nine identical copies of some cards, which cannot be found in a standard deck of playing cards (consisting of 52 different cards and two jokers). Hence, nine identical standard decks are required to perform that protocol, making the protocol not very practical. In this paper, we propose a new ZKP protocol for Sudoku that can be performed using only two standard decks of playing cards, regardless of whether the two decks are identical or different. In general, we also develop the first ZKP protocol for a generalized $n \times n$ Sudoku that can be performed using a deck of all different cards.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.